KKH Allianz
17 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Dortmund 1
30.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. High payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Hannover 2
04.12.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hannover 3
31.12.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hannover 4
24.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hannover 5
24.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hannover 6
19.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Useful management. Interesting tasks. Excellent employer.
Hannover 7
12.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 8
10.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 9
24.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 10
19.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Mainz 11
26.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 12
06.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 13
17.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Stuttgart 14
11.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Stuttgart 15
11.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Stuttgart 16
08.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Employers with criticisms.
Stuttgart 17
11.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.